Plant Ecology in a Changing World
  • Topics
    • Topic Overview
    • Biomes and Climates in a Changing World >
      • Adaptation, biodiversity, and environment
      • Climate constrains plant distributions
      • Biome and climate relationships
      • Deserts
      • Grassland, savanna, and shrub biomes
      • Forest biomes
      • Alpine and tundra biomes
    • Plant adaptation >
      • Plant microclimate 1
      • Plant microclimate 2
      • Leaf energy budgets
      • Water movement through the soil-plant continuum
      • Principles of photosynthesis
      • Photosynthesis responses to light and temperature
      • Environmental stresses limit resource capture and use
      • Nutrients in the environment
      • Adaptation to environmental stress
    • Resource Allocation Changes with Environment >
      • Architecture and canopy processes
      • Plant phenology and resource allocation enhance performance
      • Leaf economic spectrum
      • Life history and reproduction
      • Defense against herbivory
      • Plant competition
    • Plant Responses to a Changing World >
      • Global changes occurring today
      • Invasive species
      • Atmospheric CO2 impacts plant
      • C3/C4 photosynthesis and climate
      • Climate change and the global carbon cycle
      • Climate warming and its impacts
    • Engineering Plant Communities >
      • Remember Utah's past and envision our future
      • Restoration ecology
      • Managed ecosystems
      • Utah urban ecology
      • Urban ecological futures
  • Assignments
    • Assignment Overview
    • Discussion
    • Problem sets
    • Ecology & Global Changes
    • Plant ecology policy
    • Defense of policy
    • Exam #1
    • Exam #2
  • Campus
    • Campus Overview
    • Grasses
    • Green infrastructure >
      • GI Overview
      • Stormwater >
        • GI 1
        • GI 2
        • GI 3
        • GI 4
        • GI 10
      • Green roof
      • Pollinator >
        • Pollinator species
    • Trees of the Wasatch
    • Shrubs of the Wasatch
    • Invasives
  • Biomes
    • Biome Overview
    • Climate diagrams
    • Vegetation sight-seeing trip
    • Biome images
  • Models
  • Lab

Page 156

Each time I hike through the Wasatch Mountains, I cannot help but be impressed by the diverse vegetation types. In particular, as I hike up Big Cottonwood Canyon in the Wasatch Mountains, beginning at the mouth of the canyon and ending up at Brighton, I notice that there are distinct elevation zones that characterize the distribution limits of most if not all tree species. There are some clear patterns regarding the lower elevation at which a tree species first occurs and upper elevation at which that tree species disappears from the vegetation.

One strange but consistent observation that I have made is that the elevation at which a tree species first occurs on the south-facing slope is not the same as where that tree species first appears on the north-facing slope. Similarly, at the upper distribution limits, the trees disappear from the vegetation at different elevations. These observations suggest that factors other than elevation alone may be important in determining plant distribution. Moreover, I noticed a general trend for the leaf area of a given tree species to be lower at the lower distribution limits than in the mid-range elevation for that tree species.

Yet one more thing continues to puzzle me. As I hike over Guardman's Pass and make my way onto the east side of the Wasatch Mountains towards my home in Wanship, I notice that the relationships between tree distribution and elevation are slightly but consistently different. I will leave it for a future date to figure out this oddity. I know that there must a good explanation, because my cousin Wilford always says that there are strong relationships between climate and plant distribution.

I recorded observations of plant distributions for a few key species in Big Cottonwood Canyon below.


Species

Abies concolor

Abies lasiocarpa

Pseudotsuga menziesii
Lower distribution limit (m) on north-facing slope
1,685

2,050

1,870
Lower distribution limit (m) on south-facing slope
1,875

2,250

2,130
Upper distribution limit (m) on north-facing slope
2,220

no upper limit in canyon

2,195
Upper distribution limit (m) on south-facing slope
2,450

no upper limit in canyon

2,460
Go to page               Exam 1 data starter      156         157       158        159         160         161          162        163      164
Jim Ehleringer, University of Utah